jump to navigation

“Collaboration Now” Program on CNBC August 5, 2009

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Advocacy, Futuring, Media.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Just discovered a wonderful program on CNBC called “Collaboration Now“.

It has an obvious Business/Finance bent, but that’s just the people that we need on board to see the value of collaboration technologies and processes.

They have a great lineup of guests as follows:

Dr. Peter Diamandis
Chairman & CEO, X Prize and Co-Founder, Space Adventures

Anousheh Ansari
First Woman Private Space Exporer

Brian Mulroney
Former Canadian Prime Minister

Evan Rosen
Author of “The Culture of Collaboration”

Miles Everson
Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Paul Otellini
CEO, Intel

Don Proctor
Senior VP, Voice Technology, Cisco

Johan Hoegstedt

VP, Strategic Planning and Development, AstraZeneca

Dr. Ranjay Gulati
Harvard Business School

You can see the first episode here:

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@collaborativeview.com

IBM Launches Social Computing Think Tank at MIT September 18, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Blog, Media.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

In the news today in Australia is the Launch by IBM of a centre for research into Social Computing & Technologies at MIT called the Centre for Social Software.

Reseachers from around the Globe, including many of IBM’s Lotus Labs in Cambridge, Tokyo, Beijing, Haifa, San Jose & New York, will be able to do research there.

An element that will be drawn from the centre is the cultural context of social technologies.

Looks like an interesting Centre… I’ll be keen to see what comes out of the facility.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

MIT Sloan Report: An Inside View of IBM’s Innovation Jam August 27, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Media.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

MIT Sloan has released a report titled: “An Inside View of IBM’s Innovation Jam“.

This report is a fascinating insight into the reason why IBM has such a great record in Innovation and their huge production of Patents. The process is detailed, and I’m sure many organisations could learn something about how they tackle innovation from the report.

The complete text of the report is freely available for the MIT Sloane website on the link above.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

The Subtext from the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference July 28, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Competitive, Events, Media.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

A very interesting article out by AMR Research, titled “Not Swag: Six Takeaways from Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference” outlines 6 key issues that the analyst feels either needs to be addressed or Microsoft Partners need to take on board.

They are:

  1. A need to return to innovation rather than following innovation
  2. Deliberate dependency on the channel
  3. Partners need to adapt to the new models of Microsoft business (esp. SaaS)
  4. Sharepoint, Sharepoint, and more Sharepoint
  5. Deskless Worker and Mobility initiatives
  6. Increasing Apple Competitive focus

The focus on Sharepoint, Mobility, Saas delivery, and Apple competition are all areas that have an impact on the Lotus market, and are well worth understanding by Lotus Partners.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

Local Telco Meltdown… Time to reconsider the Grid Design July 21, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Blog, Commentary, Media.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

More than a million East Coast Australians were without Telco services (Mobile, Internet, Land Line, ATM, ETFPOS) for half a day late last week because of a simple cable cutting beside a residential road. All the finger pointing that is now going on in the washup does nothing to address the fact that a single cable being cut can affect so many users.

When the early Internet was designed by DARPA, one of it’s initial design considerations was survivability of communications (in those days they were considering a city in the network being taken out by nuclear force). It would seem that given the disruption to Internet services on as large a scale as the telephony, that some of these design principles are no longer in place.

When you consider that Back to base Alarm systems, some hospital equipment and even sewerage valves are managed by telephony based systems, the problem goes way beyond emergency issues such as the Emergency Phone Number system (000 in Australia) being out of action.

In our current era of uncertainty, with acts of terrorism on everyone’s minds, it is time we look at the survivability of our Telco Grid again. The simple act of cutting a roadside cable having such a devastating effect is not acceptable. Our civilisation has slowly grown to a level of strong dependance on this network and it needs to be considered critical infrastructure.

The real concern is that our leaders in government were none the wiser about cause or impact when this incident occurred. No contingency or disaster plans in place.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

Centrelink staying with Lotus… Good News for the Australian Lotus Community July 9, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Media, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

The current news that Centrelink (Australia’s Social Security Organisation) has decided to stay with the Lotus Notes Platform [Article in Australian IT] is a significant one for the Australian Lotus Community.

Centrelink is one of the largest Notes Houses in the country, and a shift away would have sent a signal through the market.

The decision does however, highlight that Notes Domino is far more than just email. The installed Domino Application base in Centrelink is a very serious factor in the decision process for making any changes.

Notes 8.0’s new user interface doesn’t hurt many of these decisions these days. It’s far harder to use the old chestnut that Outlook looks nicer any more.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

Microsoft promises 4 patches next week… or you could move to Domino. July 4, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Competitive, Media.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Why do organisations continually put up with the amount of patching that Exchange and the Microsoft stack requires.

Try a robust, secure, solid alternative! … Domino

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=870711453&eid=-100

Microsoft to patch Windows 2000, XP, SQL and Exchange servers

All four security updates listed as “important”, the company’s second-highest ranking

Gregg Keizer (Computerworld) 04 July, 2008 07:48:32

Microsoft on Thursday chalked in four security updates for next week that would fix vulnerabilities in Windows, SQL Server and Exchange Server.

All four were labeled “important,” the company’s second-highest ranking, even though one of the Windows updates will quash a bug that attackers could use to execute malicious code remotely. That kind of vulnerability has been regularly rated as “critical” by Microsoft in the past.

As is its practice for pre-patch notifications, Microsoft disclosed few details Thursday of next week’s updates other than their severity ranking and the affected software.

…[more]

Six Megatrends Reshaping Government – Collaboration Mandate! July 3, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Media.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

The following article published in CIO Magazine today discusses the IBM report just released titled “Government 2020 and the Perpetual Collaboration Mandate”.

Another great message to the Public Sector Market. A very large market here in Australia.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;201607001;pp;1

Six Megatrends Reshaping Government

A new report from IBM warns of the growing global impact of rapid changes in several areas beyond government control
Sue Bushell 03 July, 2008 11:44:20

Governments around the world have been put on notice that the way they address six simultaneous and inescapable forces reshaping public administrations and the communities they serve will determine the prosperity of their citizens into the future.

“The future of societies around the world is being shaped by six drivers outside the realm of government control”

A new report from IBM titled Government 2020 and the Perpetual Collaboration Mandate warns of the growing global impact of rapid changes in a broad range of areas. It says each trend will require individualized strategies to effectively manage, and suggests virtual organizations, in which geographically dispersed constituents can collaborate seamlessly, will play a key role.

“The future of societies around the world is being shaped by six drivers outside the realm of government control,” the report says. “Powerful changes related to demographics, globalization, environmental concerns, societal relationships, social stability and technology will affect virtually every government, demanding individualized responses suited to each nation, region or locality.

These nearly universal drivers will require ‘perpetual collaboration’ that starts with intensified, multi-directional communications, and shared operational and technical standards. Beyond those core essentials, effective strategies also hinge on government commitments to facilitate efforts involving multiple agencies (within and across borders), and improve partnering with transnational organizations.”

Research results identified a recurring theme of ‘perpetual collaboration’ as a core capability governments will need in order to prosper and best serve citizens over the next 12 years. To achieve such collaboration, IBM recommends four key approaches for government organizations:

Public and Private Collaboration: Form new alliances and models of interaction, such as global collaborative ventures, to keep pace with changes in global society.

Personalized Interaction and Services: Implement technologies that enable governments to provide convenience, increased efficiency, security and privacy in delivering services ranging from healthcare to social services.

Knowledge Creation and Sharing: Stimulate product and service innovation through interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary research, coupled with new models of knowledge sharing that can transcend multigenerations in the workplace.

Value to Constituencies: Engage constituents to raise awareness and buy into new approaches to governmental services, including services on-demand, that can provide greater value to citizens

“We are looking at a world in the midst of significant transition, where governments have the opportunity to work together more effectively, and engage their citizens and allies in the implementation of bigger goals for society,” said Gerry Mooney, general manager, IBM Global Government. “Looking ahead to 2020, we found that the idea of virtual organizations will increasingly shift from being a concept to becoming the way successful governments function.”

“Across the globe, many political leaders understand they have a choice: they can be passive and let change dictate the way their nations will adjust, or they can embrace the changes with effective strategies to improve the lives of their citizens, protect their interests and grow their profiles internationally.”

The report points to the importance to humanity of emerging capabilities in medicine, energy and information as the pace of technological development accelerates, with each bringing new costs and new expectations.

“However, the anticipation, planning and reaction times to harness technologies are decreasing. Citizens are becoming increasingly comfortable with technologies; therefore, governments have opportunities to use these to leap forward in improving services.

“Typically, the traditional mechanisms to regulate and tax activity are not adapting as quickly as new technology arrives, and intellectual property laws are more difficult to enforce in the global economy. While some technologies improve productivity (such as IT), others can increase costs (such as those related to healthcare). At the same time, governments will face the problem of protecting the security and privacy of information, while relying more on the use of such data to provide services, calling for a delicate balancing act,” the report says.

Government 2020 and the Perpetual Collaboration Mandate also outlines case studies and details critical success factors likely to determine how well a government can innovate to meet the challenges ahead, including:

  • Proactive and committed senior leadership
  • Citizen-centric, outcome-based objectives
  • Effective governance models, including intra-, inter-, and extra- organizational perspectives
  • Focused, deliberate use of innovation, integration and collaboration
  • A dynamic and integrated infrastructure
  • Continuing assessment as an ongoing, high-priority role of government
  • Governments leading by example
  • Addressing the challenges ahead will require a shift from the traditional government approach of slow, measured actions in the face of change.

Instead, governments must first anticipate change by determining which drivers are most critical in light of their own unique set of circumstances.

Second, based on those priorities, nations must be proactive, designing and then implementing customized strategies and solutions.

Unquestionably, many types of challenges are under way and governments must respond in a more comprehensive manner than ever before.

In developing tailored responses, a new dimension of greatly enhanced collaboration is the ultimate capability governments need, as it will form the foundation of strategies necessary for coping with these drivers, the report says.

More connectedness and cooperation is needed than ever before: across agencies, across societies, across governments, and with more constituencies.

Aussies paying five times more… or 50% more July 2, 2008

Posted by Glenn Irvine in Commentary, Media.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

I saw this article in yesterday’s news, and with the Aussie Dollar almost on par with the Greenback at the moment (95.88c in the dollar at the time of posting), thought I would dip my toe in the water and see what the price difference between a single user of Notes is between the US and Australia.

Needless to say I was surprised to see a 50% price differential (Not favouring Australians).

Come on IBM… we love the software, and appreciate the fluctuations of international exchange, but this is a bit much.

Regards,

Glenn Irvine
glenn.irvine@thelotusposition.net

http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,25642,23945533-5014108,00.html

Aussies paying five times more for software

By Andrew Ramadge, Technology Reporter July 01, 2008 12:01am

SO much for the “global village” — Australians are being charged up to five times more to download the same products as customers in the US.
Digital distribution, hailed as the future of software sales, is touted as being cheaper and more convenient than regular shopping as users bypass storage and shipping costs by downloading programs directly to their computer.

But the online stores of companies like Adobe and Electronic Arts are charging users different prices to download video games and graphics software depending on which country they’re in.

If a user visits the Adobe website from a computer in Australia, they are charged as much as $1000 extra to download the same program as customers who log in from the US.

Similarly, gamers who visit the Steam and Electronic Arts websites are charged up to five times more to download popular titles like Medal Of Honour: Airborne — which Australians can buy and download for $99.95, while users in the US pay just $21.15 ($US19.95).

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said it was powerless to stop the practice of regional price discrimination, as it does not contravene trade laws.

“There is no prohibition on price discrimination in the Trade Practices Act 1974,” said an ACCC spokeswoman.

“For example, it is not illegal for a supermarket chain to charge more for a particular product (such as soup) in a more affluent area where there may not be as much competition than it does in an area of greater competition, or less affluence,” she said.

… [more]